← Library
Madras High CourtSA/741/2013dismissed as settled out of court

K.R.Manickam v. Smt.Chittal

2024-07-19Honourable Mr Justice Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 19.07.2024 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP and M.P.No.1 of 2013 K.R.Manickam .. Defendant/Appellant/Appellant Vs.

Smt.Chittal ..Plaintiff/Respondent/Respondent PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the order made in A.S.No.88 of 2011 dated 27.09.2012 on the file of the Second Additional Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore by confirming the Judgment and decree made in O.S.No.165 of 2005 dated 31.01.2011 on the file of the Court of the learned District Munsif, Coimbatore.

For Appellant : Mr.V.Ashok Kumar For Respondent : No Appearance (Notice not served)

JUDGMENT

This Second Appeal has been filed to set aside the order made in A.S.No.88 of 2011 dated 27.09.2012 on the file of the Second Additional Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore by confirming the Judgment and decree made in O.S.No.165 of 2005 dated 31.01.2011 on the file of the Court of the learned District Munsif, Coimbatore.

2. The learned Counsel for the Appellant filed a memo reporting that the subject matter of the Second Appeal had been settled amicably before the trial Court. The memo is to be recorded as the Second Appeal is arising out of the Suit for recovery of money.

3. In view of the submission of the learned Counsel for the Appellant, the memo is recorded and the Second Appeal is dismissed as settled between the parties. The Appellant is entitled to refund of the Court-fee. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

19.07.2024 Index:Yes/No Internet: Yes/No dh To

1. The District Munsif, Coimbatore.

2. The Second Additional Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore.

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.

dh 19.07.2024