← Library
Madras High CourtWP/12249/2021dismissed for nonprosecution

Banu @ Selvabanumathi v. The District Revenue Officer

2026-03-23Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23-03-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Banu @ Selvabanumathi W/o.Murali, No.216-A, Green Palace Lake Road, Kumuli, Thekadi Post, Perumdedu Kerala- 685536 Rep. by her Power Agent , Mr.S.Sivakumar,S/o. Selvaraj, No.63B, Jones Road, Saidapet, Chennai- 600 015.

Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The District Revenue Officer Chennai District, No.62, Rajaji Salai, Singaravelar Maligai, Chennai- 600 001.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Chennai Central Zone, Anna Nagar West Extension, Chennai- 600 101.

3.The Tahsildar Maduravoyal Taluk Office, Rajiv Gandhi Street, Maduravoyal,Chennai-95.

Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, Directing the 3rd respondent to act upon the 1st respondents letter dated 03.01.2020 in Na.Ka. 43397/ 2019/ J14 within a time frame fixed by this Honble Court.

For Petitioner(s):

No Appearance For Respondent(s):

Mr.C.Gowthamaraj, GA

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to act upon the 1st respondent's letter dated 03.01.2020 in Na.Ka. 43397/ 2019/ J14.

2. Today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

3. On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner's representation was duly considered and rejected vide order dated 05.12.2022 and hence, nothing survives in this petition. Therefore, he prays for dismissal of this petition.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.

5. In the case on hand, today, it was submitted by the respondents that the petitioner's representation was already considered and rejected vide order dated 05.12.2022 and hence, nothing survives in this petition. In such case, it appears that the said aspect may be a reason for non-appearance of the petitioner. Therefore, this Court is inclined to dismiss the present petition.

6. In view of the above, by recording the submission made by the respondent, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No cost. 23-03-2026 nsa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To 1.The District Revenue Officer Chennai District, No.62, Rajaji Salai, Singaravelar Maligai, Chennai- 600 001.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Chennai Central Zone, Anna Nagar West Extension, Chennai- 600 101.

3.The Tahsildar Maduravoyal Taluk Office, Rajiv Gandhi Street, Maduravoyal,Chennai-95.

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J.

nsa 23-03-2026