K.Venkatasubba Raju v. C.P.Rami Reddy, S/O Late

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.04.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR C.S.No.933 of 2017 1.K.Venkatasubba Raju 2.Y.V.Srinivasan 3.Ammini Jacob 4.R.Ravikumar 5.D.Vijayakamurthy 6.Venkataramiah Choudary Kuchi 7.A.Sivakumar Reddy 8.V.S.Sankar 9.Dr.Srinivasa Naga Raja 10.Chrystal Easdon 11.Ryan Easdon 12.Roy Dasdon 13.D.Kanchana 14.Srinath Shankar 15.Durga Shankar 16.Santha Sheela Nair 17.S.S.Raghavan 18.Vaidehi Raghavan ... Plaintiffs Vs.

C.P.Rami Reddy Rep. by Power Agent K.Sathish ... Defendant Prayer: The Civil Suit has been filed under Order IV Rule 1 of the O.S.Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of C.P.C. 1908, declaring that the plaintiffs are jointly and absolutely entitled to the 1/15th undivided share in 4 grounds and 112 sq. ft. retained by the defendant comprised in Survey No.168 Part, forming part of DTP approved layout

No.91/65 and bearing Plot No.36, Thiruvanmiyur Village, assessed as Old No.41A, New No.70, Beach Road, Kalakshetra Colony, Chennai 600 090 and morefully described in the schedule and consequently restrain the defendant, his men, agents or anybody claiming through him from in any manner interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property by the plaintiffs.

For Plaintiffs : Mr.P.Rajesh For Defendant : Mr.P.B.Balaji

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the plaintiffs and the defendant are present and filed a joint memo of compromise entered between the parties dated 29.03.2018. The parties are also present before the Court and signed the joint memo of compromise. In fact the defendant submitted himself to a decree, confirming the 1/15th undivided share of the plaintiffs in the suit property.

2.Hence, the preliminary decree passed in terms of the joint memo of compromise. The joint memo of compromise dated 29.03.2018 shall form part and parcel of the decree. There shall be no order as to costs.

kas 27.04.2018 N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

kas C.S.No.933 of 2017 27.04.2018