← Library
Madras High CourtWMP/2277/2017disposed of

Rangarajan Narasimhan, v. The Director,

2017-02-01Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice M. Sundar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Special Original Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the First day of February Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR SANJAY KISHAN KAUL THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE M. SUNDAR WMP NO.2277 OF 2017 IN WP.574/2015 RANGARAJAN NARASIMHAN, [ PETITIONER ] SANATHANA DHARMA/SRI VAISHNAVISM Vs 1 THE DIRECTOR, [ RESPONDENTS ] ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA, JANPAT, NEW DELHI-110004.

2 THE SUPERINTENDING ARCHAEOLOGIST, CHENNAI CIRCLE, ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA, CHENNAI-9.

3 THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF TAMILNADU, SECRETARIAT, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI-9.

4 THE SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF TAMILNADU, TOURISM, CULTURE AND RELIGIOUS ENDOWMENT DEPT., SECRETARIAT, CHENNAI-9.

5 HERITAGE CONSERVATION SOCIETY, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MR.SRIKUMAR, 102/X,KURUNJ STREET, POLEPETTAI, TUTICORIN.

6 THE COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, CHENNAI-34.

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to

To Direct the concerned police authorities to provide the petitioner with a Personal Security Officer (PSO) and his family with adequate police protection to ensure the safety of my family & myself in WMP.2277/17 in WP.No.574/14.

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.RANARAJAN NARASIMHAN, Advocate for the petitioner in person and of Mr.SU.SRINIVASAN ASG for 1 & 2 respondents and Mr.R.MUTHUKUMARASWAMY AG ASSIT BY M. MAHARAJA, (HR & CE ) Special Government Pleader for 4 & 6 respondents and Mr.R.VIJAYAKUMAR, Additional Government Pleader for the 3rd respondent the court made the following order:- On hearing the learned counsel for parties, it is directed that adequate security arrangement should be provided to the applicant and his family members. In view of what the applicant has expressed in the application, the threat perception be revisited.

The application, accordingly, stands disposed of. -sd/- 01/02/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub Assistant Registrar ( Statistics / C.S. ) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE DIRECTOR, ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA, JANPAT, NEW DELHI-110004.

2 THE SUPERINTENDING ARCHAEOLOGIST, CHENNAI CIRCLE, ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA, CHENNAI-9.

3 THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF TAMILNADU, SECRETARIAT, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI-9.

4 THE SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF TAMILNADU, TOURISM, CULTURE AND RELIGIOUS ENDOWMENT DEPT., SECRETARIAT, CHENNAI-9.

5 HERITAGE CONSERVATION SOCIETY, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MR.SRIKUMAR, 102/X,KURUNJ STREET, POLEPETTAI, TUTICORIN.

6 THE COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, CHENNAI-34.

C.C. to MR.RANARAJAN NARASIMHAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges The Government Advocate, High Court, Madras - 104. Order in WMP.2277/2017 in WP.574/2015 Date :01/02/2017 From 26.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Interim Orders in this format SDR 06.02.2017