← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/7062/2024granted

Alexander Daniel Alias Daniel v. The State Represented By

2024-04-04Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi5 pages

Crl.O.P.No.7062 of 2024 T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

The petitioner who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 3(2 ), a, 4(1), 5 (1), (a), The Immoral Traffic (Prevention Act 1956), in Crime No.22 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused persons operated a prostitution business in the name and style of Ayura Ayur spa. Hence, the case.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. However, on instructions, the learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner, on his own volition, is ready and willing to contribute a some amount to the charitable purpose as imposed by this Court. Learned counsel prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 1/5

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl side) submits that the petitioner is the owner of the said spa and he submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner. He vehemently oppose for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl Side), there is no previous case pending against the petitioner. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the II Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) 2/5

with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) to the credit registered Advocate Clerks Association, Chennai. [b] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [c] the petitioner is directed to report before the respondent police on every Saturday at 10.30. a.m, for a period of three months and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, 3/5

the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC. 04.04.2024 pbl 4/5

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

pbl Crl.O.P.No.7062 of 2024 04.04.2024 5/5