Madras High CourtCRL OP/17454/2015dismissed

S.Solaiappan v. Gopinath

2015-08-17Honourable Mr Justice B. Rajendran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :17.8.2015 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B. RAJENDRAN Crl.OP.No.17454 of 2015 S.Solaiappan

...Petitioner

vs.

1. Gopinath

2. State by Inspector of Police Central Crime Branch 18th Team, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

...Respondents

Revision Petition filed under Sections 439 (2) of Cr.P.C. to cancel the bail granted to the respondent/accused in Crl.OP.No.1467 of 2013 order dated 23.7.2013.

For Petitioner :

Mr.G.Jeremiah For R1 :

Mr.A.M.Rahmath Ali For R2 :

Mr.V.Arul, Government Advocate

ORDER

The defacto complainant has preferred the above Criminal Original Petition to cancel the bail granted to the accused.

2. This Court, by order dated 23.7.2013, granted bail to the respondent/accused on condition that the accused shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- to the credit of Crime No.567 of 2012.

3. The learned counsel for the first respondent/accused submitted that the first respondent /accused has complied with the above said condition imposed by this Court and the same has also been admitted by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side).

4. The said submission is recorded.

5. Now, the petitioner/defacto complainant has come forward with this petition seeking to cancel the bail granted to the first respondent/ accused stating that the first respondent/ accused https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

threatened him in dire consequences after obtaining the bail.

6. It appears that the petitioner has not given any compliant so far with regard to the alleged threatening. The petitioner has given a petition dated 19.1.2015 to the Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai - 600 007 requesting for transfer of investigation to the CB CID or CBI. In the said petition, the petitioner, in one line, has stated that the first respondent threatened him. The petitioner has not given any separate complaint with regard to the alleged threatening.

7. Even without giving a compliant, the petitioner has straightaway approached this Court for cancellation of bail. Therefore, the petition deserves to be dismissed. 8 . Accordingly, the Criminal Original petition is dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ga To 1.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

2.The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, 18th Team, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

Crl.OP.No.17454 of 2015 AD (CO) PSI (03.09.2015) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/