Ramalingam v. State Rep By.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifteenth day of April Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.6878 of 2021 RAMALINGAM [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP BY.

[ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUTHALAM POLICE STATION, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT.

CRIME NO. 160/2021 For Petitioner : M/S J.JAWAHAR Advocate For Respondent : M/S.P.KRITIKA KAMAL, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 4(1)(aaa) r/w 4(1-A) of T.N.P. Act (Transport) in Cr.No.160 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in possession of 110 litres of Pondy arrack.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and that he has been falsely implicated in this case. 4.The learned Government Advocate would submit that there are eighteen previous cases pending against the petitioner. 5.Considering the fact that there are eighteen previous cases pending against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6.This criminal original petition is accordingly dismissed. -sd/- 15/04/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUTHALAM POLICE STATION, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, CHENNAI-104 CC to M/S J.JAWAHAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.6878/2021 Date :15/04/2021 RG.03.05.2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/