← Library
Madras High CourtA/1918/2022allowed

S.V.Ramamurthy v. Singu R Mangaleshkar And 5 Others

2022-06-23Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION) THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2022 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY A.No.1918 of 2022 in C.S.No.390 of 2020 Mr. Singu R Mangaleshkar, residing at 39b Spilsby Road, Boston PE21 9NX, United Kingdom and permanent Indian address at No. 3 Flat B, 5th Cross Street, Andal Nagar, Velachery, Chennai - 42, India.

... Plaintiff -Vs1.

Mr. S.V. Ramamurthy, No. 38/82, C.N.Krishnaswamy Road, Triplicane, Chennai - 600 005.

2.

Mr. Bhupeshkar, 10245, Little Brick House, Ellicott City, Maryland, USA.

Permanent address, No.3, Flat B, 5th Street, Andal Nagar, Velachery, Chennai - 42.

3.

Velacherry, Chennai 600 042.

4.

Office of S.R.O., Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 107.

5.

Office of S.R.O., Purasaiwakkam, Chennai 600 007.

6.

Madhavaram, Chennai.

... Defendants A.No.1918 of 2022 1.

Mr. S.V. Ramamurthy, No. 38/82, C.N.Krishnaswamy Road, Triplicane, Chennai - 600 005.

... Applicant Vs.

Mr. Singu R Mangaleshkar, residing at 39b Spilsby Road, Boston PE21 9NX, United Kingdom and permanent Indian address at No. 3 Flat B, 5th Cross Street, Andal Nagar, Velachery, Chennai - 42, India.

2.

Mr. Bhupeshkar, 10245, Little Brick House, Ellicott City, Maryland, USA.

3.

Velacherry,

Chennai 600 042.

4.

Office of S.R.O., Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 107.

5.

Office of S.R.O., Purasaiwakkam, Chennai 600 007.

6.

Madhavaram, Chennai.

... Respondents Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to set aside expartee order dated 22.03.2022 in C.S.No. 390 of 2020. This Application coming on this day before this court for hearing, the court made the following order:- This Application has been filed to set aside the exparte order dated 22.03.2022 in C.S.No.390 of 2020.

2.Heard both sides.

3.The learned counsel for the Applicant/first defendant submitted that he could not appear before the Court on 22.03.2022, since he was held up before the other Court and hence, the defendant was set ex-parte. 4.The learned counsel for the first respondent/plaintiff, though has filed a formal counter, he has no serious objection in allowing this Application.

5.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this Application, this Application is allowed. Sd./-KRJ.

23/06/2022 //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2022.

COURT OFFICER(O.S.) From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format. EVK 01/07/2022