← Library
Madras High CourtWP/9010/2026disposed of

Ramasamy v. The Inspector General Of Registration

2026-03-11Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Ramasamy S/o Krishnasamy, No 2/28A, Panjukaran Thottam, Vattalapathy, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu 638 103 ..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Inspector General of Registration No 100, Santhome high Road, Pattinambakkam, Foreshore Road, Chennai.

2. The District Registrar District Registrar office, No 82, Raj Complex, P.N. Raod, Tiruppur 641 602.

3. The Sub Registrar Sub Registrar office, Kunnathur, Tiruppur 641 601.

4. The Tahsildar, Uthukuli, Tiruppur 638 752.

..Respondent(s) PRAYER - This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to conclude the guideline value fixation for the petitioner's land in S.No.97/2A1 Now subdivided as S.No 97/2A2 situated at Vattalapathy Village, Uthukuli Taluk,

Tiruppur District by considering the Petitioner's representation dated 13.01.2026 within a stipulated time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner(s):

Mr.G.C.Nelson Britto For Respondent(s):

Mr.U.Baranidharan, Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to fix the guideline value for the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this Writ Petition, which according to the petitioner, is owned by him based on the petitioner's representation dated 13.01.2026, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2.According to the petitioner, the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this Writ Petition is absolutely owned by him and it is a patta land. However, according to the petitioner, presently the guideline value is shown as "zero" value for the said property. Therefore, the petitioner had given a representation on 13.01.2026 to the respondents requesting them to fix the guideline value for his property. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition. 3.Mr.U.Baranidharan, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law, after due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation. 5.For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 4th respondent to fix the guideline value for the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this Writ Petition based on the petitioner's representation dated 13.01.2026, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6.With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 11-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order GSA To

1. The Inspector General of Registration No 100, Santhome high Road, Pattinambakkam, Foreshore Road, Chennai.

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

GSA

2. The District Registrar District Registrar office, No 82, Raj Complex, P.N. Raod, Tiruppur 641 602.

3. The Sub Registrar Sub Registrar office, Kunnathur, Tiruppur 641 601.

4. The Tahsildar, Uthukuli Tiruppur 638 752.

11-03-2026