← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/8091/2022granted

Suresh v. State Rep By The

2022-04-07Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Seventh day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.8091 of 2022 1 SURESH [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 KANAGARAJ Vs STATE REP BY THE [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVARUR TALUK POLICE STATION, THIRUVARUR DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.105 OF 2022) For Petitioner : M/S. P. MUTHAMIZH SELVAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 324, 506(II) of IPC in Crime No.105 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.

The petitioners apprehending arrest on complaint alleging used of abusive language and life threat with weapon are before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. For the alleged incident took place on 30.10.2021 causing abrasion on the right knee and the incident of threat alleged to have happened on 18.03.2022. The complaint registered on 23.03.2022 3.

Taking note of the fact that those 2 incidents occurred in 2 different dates and complaint lodged belatedly, combining both the incident this Court is of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required.

4.

In view of the above, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5.

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of seven days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvarur, on condition that each of the petitioners shall execute separate bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand Only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate, failing which the anticipatory bail shall stand canceled and on further condition that:

(a) the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b) the petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer as and when required for interrogation;

(c) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d) the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f) if the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

-sd/- 07/04/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUVARUR.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVARUR DISTRICT. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVARUR TALUK POLICE STATION, THIRUVARUR DISTRICT.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1 CC to M/S. P. MUTHAMIZH SELVAKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO. 5425 CRL OP.8091/2022 Date :07/04/2022 RW 19/04/2022