K.Mani, (M/37/2018) v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16.02.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH CRL.O.P.No.3790 of 2018 K.Mani

...Petitioner

Vs

1. State Rep.by The Superintendent of Police, O/o.Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore.

2. The Inspector of Police, Sulur Police Station, Coimbatore.

...Respondents

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying to direct the second respondent to register a case against the proposed accused namely Mr.Ponnusamy and his sons Mayuran and Thiruchenduran based upon the complaint made by the petitioner to the respondents herein on 13.11.2017, investigate the same and to file the final report against all the proposed accused in accordance with law.

For Petitioner : M/s.Right Law Associates For Respondent : Mrs.P.Kritika Kamal Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

The prayer sought for in the present petition is to direct the first respondent herein to direct the second respondent to register a case against the proposed accused namely Mr.Ponnusamy and his sons Mayuran and Thiruchenduran based upon the complaint made by the petitioner to the respondents herein on 13.11.2017, investigate the same and to file the final report against all the proposed accused.

2.By consent of both sides, this Criminal Original Petition is taken up for final disposal.

3.The grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of a

complaint given by him on 13.11.2017 to the first respondent, the same has been kept in abeyance without any action. It is well settled in the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others [2013

(6) CTC 353], that registration of an FIR is mandatory under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure if an information furnished to the police officer disclose commission of a cognizable offence and in cases where the information does not disclose a cognizable offence, a preliminary enquiry has to be conducted.

4. The first respondent is not justified in having received the complaint and keeping it unattended without any further action. In view of the same, the petitioner has made out a case for this Court to invoke its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

5.In the result, the petitioner is directed to give a copy of the complaint dated 13.11.2017 to the Station House Officer having territorial jurisdiction over the issue. On receipt of the said copy of the complaint, the concerned Station House Officer shall adhere to the following directions. 1)If the information received by the second respondent discloses commission of a cognizable offence, then, the same shall be forthwith registered.

2)If an information received does not disclose a cognizable offence, the second respondent shall conduct a preliminary inquiry to ascertain whether cognizable offence is disclosed therein or not and such inquiry shall be completed within a period of fifteen days from the date of information.

3) If the inquiry discloses the commission of a cognizable offence, the FIR must be registered, if not already registered or closed.

4) If the preliminary inquiry ends in closing the complaint, the closure report must be recorded along with the reasonings and a copy of the same shall be furnished to the complainant within one week.

5)All information relating to cognizable offences whether resulting in registration of FIR or leading an inquiry must be reflected in the general diary/station diary/daily diary of the respondent's police station.

6. In the result, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed with the above directions.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO ) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vv To

1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o.Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore.

2. The Inspector of Police, Sulur Police Station, Coimbatore.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras +1cc to Mr.Right Law Associates, Advocate SR.No.12721 CRL.O.P.No.3790 of 2018 NRI(CO) GN(27/02/2018)