Sattar v. The State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 19.03.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN Sattar

...Petitioner/Accused

Vs.

State represented by The Inspector of Police, F-1, Chintadaripet Police Station, Chennai District.

(Crime No.38 of 2024)

...Respondent

PRAYER:

Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail concerned in Crime No.38 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police on such terms and conditions. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Balachandran For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/4

ORDER

The petitioner/accused in Crime No.38 of 2024, registered for the offences under Sections 273 and 328 of IPC r/w 7(1) and 20(2) of COTPA Act and remanded to judicial custody on 09.03.2024 with possession of 53 small size mava packets and cash of Rs.600/-, seeks bail.

2.It is stated that there are three previous cases against the petitioner but however, taking all other factors into consideration, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: 3.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the XIV Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, and on further conditions that: - [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police 2/4

everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

19.03.2024 ata C.V.KARTHIKEYAN.

J.

3/4

ata To

1. The XIV Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.

2. The Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.

3.The Inspector of Police, F-1, Chintadaripet Police Station, Chennai District.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

19.03.2024 4/4