← Library
Madras High CourtCRL MP/4152/2026dismissed

I.Praveen Kumar David v. Minor P.Nikitha

2026-04-02Honourable Mr.Justice C.Kumarappan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02-04-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN AND CRL RC SR NO. 6401 OF 2026 I.Praveen Kumar David S/o.Mr.D.Isak Selvakumar, 20, Ramanathan Street, Erode District - 638 452.

Petitioner(s) Vs

1. Minor P.Nikitha 2.R.Ramya Respondent(s) CRL RC SR No. 6401 of 2026

1. I.Praveen Kumar David Petitioner(s) Vs

1. Minor P.Nikitha Respondent(s) PRAYER To condone the delay of 462 days in filing the above revision before this Honble Court against the fair and final order dated 25.09.2024 passed in M.C.No.22 of 2018 on the file of the Principal Family Court, Coimbatore and thus render justice.

CRL RC SR No. 6401 of 2026 PRAYER To set aside the judgment dated 25.09.2024 passed in M.C.No.22 of 2018 on the file of the learned Additional Principal Family Judge. For Petitioner(s):

M/s.M.Karthik For Respondent(s):

No representation COMMON ORDER No representation for the respondents.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. On perusal of the records, it is seen that the Maintenance Case was ordered on 25.09.2024, directing the petitioner/father to pay a sum of Rs.20,000/- per month as maintenance to the second petitioner/wife from the date of petition till the minor daughter attains majority, and also to pay the educational expenses of the minor daughter. However, the petition was dismissed insofar as the first petitioner is concerned. The Maintenance Case itself pertains to the year 2018.

4. The present petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 482 days in filing the Criminal Revision Case. The only reason assigned by the

petitioner is that he was suffering from jaundice and had taken conventional treatment. However, no medical records or acceptable proof have been produced to substantiate the said claim.

5. Taking into consideration of the above facts, particularly the inordinate delay of 482 days and the absence of sufficient and satisfactory explanation for such delay, this Court is of the view that no sufficient cause has been shown in the affidavit filed in support of this petition to condone the delay.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed and consequently, the Criminal Revision Case is rejected at the SR stage itself. 02-04-2026 skr Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes

C.KUMARAPPAN J.

skr AND CRL RC SR NO. 6401 OF 2026 02-04-2026