← Library
Madras High CourtCMP/6594/2024ordered

Santhi v. R. Shanthosh

2024-06-26Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh1 pages

C.M.P.No.6594 of 2024 in C.M.A.Sr.No.35541 of 2024 N.ANAND VENKATESH , J Notice has been served on respondents 1 and 3 and their names have been printed in the cause list. However, there is no appearance either in person or through a counsel.

2. Mrs.R.Sreevidhya, learned counsel, takes notice for second respondent.

3. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 266 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the records.

5. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this miscellaneous petition is allowed and the delay of 266 days in filing the above appeal is condoned.

5. Registry is directed to number the main Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission in due course. Registry is directed to print the name of Mrs.R.Sreevidhya, learned counsel for second respondent, at the time of admission.

It is made clear that for the period of delay of 266 days, the appellants will not be entitled for any interest if in the event of this Court enhancing the amount of compensation fixed by the Tribunal.

26.06.2024 gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis