Vedachalam, M/A 68 Years, v. The State Rep By Its,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09.08.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN Crl.R.C.No.696 of 2018 Vedachalam .. Petitioner Vs.

The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Chithamur Police Station, Kancheepuram District.

Crime No.200/2006 .. Respondent PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records relating to the order dated 22.03.2018 passed by the learned Sub-Judge, Madurantakam in C.M.P.No.164/2017 in S.C.No.134/2015 and set aside the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.G. Magesh Kumar For Respondent : Mr.R. Vinoth Raja, Government Advocate

O R D E R

The matter is heard through "Video Conference". 2.

The petition is filed for return of property, pending further investigation. Subsequently, the investigation was registered and final report was filed. The case was taken on file as S.C.No.134/2015. The defacto complainant claiming ownership of gold jewels filed petition under Section 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C., for return of gold namely three sovereigns. The petition was dismissed on the ground that what was recovered from the accused is ingot, against which the revision is filed. 3.

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

respondent submitted that P.W.1 to P.W.5 have been examined and the case is posted for examination of I.O., and NBW is pending against the accused. The respondent-police shall execute the warrant and complete the case, within a period of eight weeks. 4.

Accordingly, the criminal revision case is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VII) // True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar AT To

1. The Subordinate Judge, Madurantakam.

2. The Inspector of Police, Chithamur Police Station, Kancheepuram District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras-104.

Crl.R.C.No.696 of 2018 RP(CO) SU(02/09/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/