R.Elangosanthuram, v. The Board Of Governors,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.03.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.38710 of 2015 & W.M.P.No.15679 of 2016
1. R.Elangosanthuram
2. A.Gunalan
3. M.Elangovan
4. K.B.Swaminathan
5. S.T.Sarasavalli
6. Hemalatha Hariharan
7. G.Mathangi
8. Booma Sowrirajan
9. B.Latha
10. J.Tamilarasi
11. Mr.M.Balakrishnan
12. M.Vijayalatha
13. M.Janaki Devi
14. M.Sathiyanarayanan
15. D.Ezhilarasi
16. V.Govindarajan
17. N.S.Ramadevi
18. P.N.Ragurajan
19. C.S.Sundar
20. S.Gopalan
21. A.Ganesan
22. S.M.Fathima
23. G.VijayaBanu
24. B.Sreedevi
25. S.Nirmala
26. Indira Raghavan
27. S.Luxmy
28. M.Lenin Peusic
29. E.Pushpa
30. V.Prabaharan
31. Chitra Sankar
32. K.Hariharan
33. L.Ramesh
34. R.Babu
35. M.Ranjan
36. D.Inbamani
37. D.Ravi
38. V.K.Loganathan
39. A.V.Selvavinayagam
40. R.Anuburaj
41. Dr.D.Ravanan
42. P.Asokan ... Petitioners Vs.
1. The Board of Governors, Represented by the Chairman, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, No.3, Jaswant Baug (Runwal Park), Behind Akbarallys, Chembur Naka, Chembur, Mumbai 400 071
2. The Director, Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai - 600 036.
3. The Registrar, Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai - 600 036.
... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to adhere to the procedure laid down by the Government of India in DOPT, O.M. No.21011/1/2005-Estt (A) (Pt. 11) dated 14.05.2009 and subsequent orders on the subject pertaining to the APARs and assess the performance of the employees of the IITM after giving them the opportunity to write self -Appraisal first in the APAR and to communicate the copy of the entire APAR as per the aforesaid O.M., for and from the year 2014-2015 onwards. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Natarajan For Respondents : Mr.Karthik Raja - R2 & R3
ORDER
Today, when this matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that due to efflux of time, the relief sought for herein has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for adjudication. 2.In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vrc
To
1. The Chairman, Board of Governors, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, No.3, Jaswant Baug (Runwal Park), Behind Akbarallys, Chembur Naka, Chembur, Mumbai 400 071
2. The Director, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036.
3. The Registrar, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036.
W.P.No.38710 of 2015 GSM(CO) KM(29/04/2021)