Subramani@Usen v. The State Rep.By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 01.06.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.7003 of 2020 Subramani @ Usen ... Petitioner Vs.

The State rep. by

...Respondent

Sub-Inspector of Police, Virudhachalam Police Station, Cuddalore District.

Crime No.192 of 2020 Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest pending investigation in Crime No.192 of 2020 on the file of the Sub-Inspector of Police, Virudhachalam Police Station, Cuddalore. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Selvam For Respondent : Mr.K.Prabakar Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 379 and 430 of IPC and Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, in Crime No.192 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had transported 1⁄2 unit of sand by using bullock cart without any valid licence. Hence the complaint.

3. According to the petitioner, the petitioner is in no way connected with the alleged offences and he has been falsely implicated in the case on hand and he would submit that there is no previous case against the petitioner. On instruction, he would further submit that the petitioner is prepared to deposit an amount of Rs.5,000/-, as non refundable deposit to the concerned District/Taluk Legal Services Authority and prayed for grant of Anticipatory Bail.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the quantity of sand involved is 1⁄2 unit. Hence, he opposed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. In view of the fact that there is no previous case against the petitioner and in order to curb the illegal sand mining activities, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) as non refundable deposit to th concerned District / Taluk Legal Services Authority and the receipt of such payment shall be produced before the concerned Magistrate at the time of executing bail bond without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court.

6.Merely, because the petitioner deposits the said amount, it would not amount to admission of his guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently. 7.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only), as non refundable deposit to the concerned District / Taluk Legal Services Authority and on such deposit, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Virudhachalam, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only), as non refundable deposit to concerned District / Taluk Legal Services Authority.

[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

8.With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

-sd/- 01/06/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, VIRUDHACHALAM.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CUDDALORE. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIRUDHACHALAM POLICE STATION, CUDDALORE DISTRICT.

5 THE SECRETARY, DISTRICT/TALUK LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY CUDDALORE.

CC to MR.M.SELVAM, Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.7003/2020 Date :01/06/2020 TA-10/06/2020