Dr.Sooriyakala Sreekumar v. The Assistant Commissioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.12.2020

CORAM

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH TAX CASE (APPEAL) NO.158 OF 2013 Dr.Sooriyakala Sreekumar ... Appellant/Appellant Vs.

The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Business Circle V.

... Respondent/Respondent Prayer:- Tax Case (Appeal) filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai, dated 5.2.2013 made in ITA No.1143/Mds/2012 for the Assessment Year 2008-09. Against the Order dated 28.03.2012 on the file of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals-VIII), Chennai-600 034 made in GIR.NO./PAN.AWRPS4778E for the Assessment Year 2008-2009 and against the Order dated 16.11.2010 on the file of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-V, Chennai-34 made in AWRPS4778E for the Assessment Year 2008-2009. For Appellant : Mr.Suhrith Parthasarathy For Respondent : Mr.J.Narayanasamy, Senior Standing Counsel

JUDGMENT

(Delivered by DR.VINEET KOTHARI,J) The learned counsel Mr.Suhrith Parthasarathy appearing for the Appellant/Assessee submitted that the Assessee has availed the benefit under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020 and therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the present Tax Case Appeal.

2. Mr.J.Narayanasamy, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondent/Revenue has no objection for the same.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Accordingly, the Tax Case Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ssk.

To

1. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai.

2. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Business Circle V, Chennai.

3. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals VIII), Chennai-34.

+1cc to Mr.Suhrith Parthasarathy, Advocate, S.R.No.42735 T.C.(A)No.158 of 2013 SR(CO) CS/20/01/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/