Gopal v. Navaneetham

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06.08.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.A.No.1466 of 2007 1.Gopal 2.Ellammal ..... Appellants vs 1.Navaneetham 2.Shanthi 3.Stanley 4.Stella 5.Michaelraj ... Respondents Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree dated 29.09.2005 in A.S.No.19 of 2004 on the file of Subordinate Court, Thirupathur in confirming the judgment and decree dated 24.02.2004 made in O.S.No.194 of 1998 passed by the Additional District Munsif, Ambur. For appellant :No appearance

JUDGMENT

The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal" today. There is no representation on the side of the appellants today.

2. Even on the last hearing date i.e., on 28.07.2021, there was no representation for the appellants. Therefore, it can now be inferred that the appellants are not interested to prosecute the Second Appeal. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sr https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The Subordinate Judge, Thirupathur

2. The Additional District Munsif, Ambur.

S.A.No.1466 of 2007 PM(CO) CB(23/08/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/