G.Maluram Misser v. K.Vijayalakshmi

Application No.3054 of 2017 in C.S.No.758 of 2010 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN J, The Application has been filed by the first respondent to receive the documents.

2.It is seen that there are 17 documents which have been produced.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant / first defendant and also the learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff.

4. Following the ruling given in 2001 (3) SCC 1[Bipin Shantilal Panchal -vs-State of Gujarat and another], the documents are to be taken on file and marked as exhibits, however subject to admissibility, proof and relevancy. 5.It is also represented by the learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff that some of the documents are xerox copies. and naturally, the issue of admissibility has to be decided in accordance with law.

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN J, srn

6. This Application is allowed on the basis of the above representation.

7. The witness for the defendant to appear on 11.07.2017 before the learned Additional Master No.IV for recording of evidence.

03.07.2017 srn Application No.3054 of 2017 in C.S.No.758 of 2010 http://www.judis.nic.in