Mujibur Rahman v. State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police

Crl.O.P.No.6436 of 2023 Crl.O.P.No.6436 of 2023 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w.20(b), (ii), (A), 29(1) NDPS Act and 328 of IPC in Crime No.73 of 2023, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in possession of 470 grams of Ganja. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the petitioner is a habitual offender. He would further submit that there are twelve previous cases pending against him, out of which seven cases are NDPS cases. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.No.6436 of 2023 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

Lpp

5. Taking into consideration the bad antecedents of the petitioner and also considering the fact that the petitioner has twelve previous cases pending against him, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 24.03.2023 Lpp Crl.O.P.No.6436 of 2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis