Madras High CourtCRL RC/783/2015closed

Mrs.Sangamitra v. The State Rep. By

2017-02-08Honourable Mr Justice C. T. Selvam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08.02.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM Crl.R.C.Nos.783,784 and 853 of 2015 & M.P.Nos.1,1,1 of 2015 Sangamitra ... Petitioner in all cases/ 2nd respondent/Defacto Complainant Vs.

1.State by The Inspector of Police W-15, All Women Police Station Chennai 2.Suresh ... Respondent in all cases/ Petitioner/Complainant/ Accused-1 Prayer in Crl.R.C.No.783 of 2015: Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. to call for the records in C.C.No.251 of 2013 and to set aside the order made in Crl.M.P.No.1212 of 2015 by the learned XVI Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai on 19.06.2015. Prayer in Crl.R.C.No.784 of 2015: Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. to call for the records in C.C.No.251 of 2013 and to set aside the order made in Crl.M.P.No.1213 of 2015 by the learned XVI Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai on 19.06.2015. Prayer in Crl.R.C.No.853 of 2015: Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. to call for the records in C.C.No.

251 of 2013 and to set aside the order made in Crl.M.P.No.1647 of 2015 by the learned XVI Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai on 23.07.2015. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mohammed Rafi For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohammed Riyaz, Govt.Advocate (Crl.side) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.

***** C O M M O N O R D E R These revisions arise out of marital discord between parties.

2. Under a memo filed by both, a settlement of dispute and terms thereof is informed. Such joint memo signed both by the parties as also their respective counsel is notarized. In the circumstances, these revisions shall stand closed. The joint memo of compromise dated 06.02.2017 shall form part of the records. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

3. Given the position that the dispute between the parties stand settled, the pendency of C.C.No.251 of 2013 on the file of learned XVI Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai, wherein the second respondent faces trial for offence u/s. 341,323,498 A r/w 34 IPC, will stand in the way of healing old wounds, this Court considers it appropriate to exercise powers u/s. 482 Cr.P.C and quash all further proceedings in such case.

Learned counsel for petitioner has made an endorsement informing that petitioner has no objection to such a course. Herein to enter the Memo of Compromise.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CO) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar To 1.The XVI Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai 2.The Inspector of Police W-15, All Women Police Station Chennai 3.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.

+3cc to Mr.N. Manoharan, Advocate SR. 8211, 8210 and 8209 Crl.R.C.Nos.783,784 and 853 of 2015 & M.P.Nos.1,1,1 of 2015 NMI(CO) VR(06/03/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/