Madras High CourtWP/15317/2016dismissed for nonprosecution

E.Murugan, v. The Director General Of Police

2017-08-02Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.08.2017 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P. NO.15317 OF 2016 E. Murugan

...Petitioner

1. The Director General of Police,

2. The Additional Director General of Police,

3. Inspector General of Police (SB CID),

4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police (SB CID),

5. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Vellore Range, Thorapadi, Vellore, Vellore District.

6. The District Superintendent of Police, Vengikkal, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District.

7. Murugan Police Officer, SB CID, Kannamangalam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the

respondent authorities 1 to 6 to consider the petitioner's representations dated 09.02.2016 and 07.04.2016 and dispose of the same in accordance with law.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.K.Dhanajayan, Special Government Pleader for RR1 to R6

ORDER

When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 01.08.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was ordered to be posted on 02.08.2017, under the caption 'for dismissal'.

2. Today, even though, the matter is listed under the caption 'for dismissal', neither the petitioner nor his counsel is present to prosecute the matter. Hence the Writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar cgi/sli To.