Madras High CourtWP/10113/2010dismissed as infructuous

M.K.Radhakrishnan v. The Collector

2017-12-06Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06-12-2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.10113 of 2010 And M.P.No.1 of 2010 M.K.Radhakrishnan ..Petitioner -vs1.The District Collector, Kancheepuram.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Kancheepuram.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kancheepuram.

4.The Tahsildar, Sriperumpudur.

..Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service and allowing to retire in the post of V.A.O. For Petitioner - Mr.M.Neelakandan for Mr.P.R.Balasubramanian.

For Respondents - Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari, Government Advocate.

ORDER

In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the writ petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed. -s/d- Deputy Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Svn To 1.The District Collector, Kancheepuram.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Kancheepuram.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kancheepuram.

4.The Tahsildar, Sriperumpudur.

+1 CC to Govt. Pleader sr 87393.

WP 10113 of 2010 SP(18/12/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/