M.Manikandan v. State Rep.By, The Inspector Of Police,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.03.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN M.Manikandan ... Petitioner Vs.
State represented by Inspector of Police, Adhamangalam Padur Police, Thiruvannamalai District.
... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in Crime No.37 of 2026 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Adhamangalam Padhur Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.
For Petitioners : Mr.C.R.Gobinaath For Respondent : Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER
The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 303(2) and 326 of BNS and Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.37 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 1/6
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner, had illegally transported one unit of Soolai sand without any valid permit through a tractor. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that there is no previous cases to the credit of the petitioner. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner had illegally transported one unit of soolai sand. However, he fairly submitted that the petitioner has no previous cases registered against him. 5.From the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), it is seen that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. Since the petitioner did not come under the adverse notice of the respondent, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.
2/6
6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the Judicial Magistrate Court-I, Kalasapakkam, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions: (a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;
(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;
(c) The petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am and 5.30 pm. for a period of six weeks and thereafter as and when required;
(d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. 3/6
State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];
(e) If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act.
10.03.2026 rap 4/6
To 1.The Judicial Magistrate Court-I, Kalasapakkam. 2.The Inspector of Police, Adhamangalam Padur Police, Thiruvannamalai District.
3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
5/6
C.KUMARAPPAN.J.
rap 10.03.2026 6/6