Pandian v. State By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 27.08.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.R.C.No.877 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015

1. Pandian

2. Arulmozhi

3. Shanmugam

...Petitioners

Vs.

1. State by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Sation, Villianur, Puducherry.

(Cr.No.12 of 2008)

2. Mahalachumy

...Respondents

This Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 read with 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure against the order dated 13.01.2009 made in Crl.M.P.No.1549 of 2014 in C.C.No.46 of 2009, on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Puducherry. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.R.Ravichandran Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 R2 - Notice served No Appearance

O R D E R

When the criminal revision was taken up for hearing on 24.08.2018, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence the matter was directed to be listed on 27.08.2018 "for dismissal".

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Accordingly today the matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal". Even today, when the matter is called for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

Hence, the criminal revision is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar cgi To

1. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Puducherry.

2. The Public Prosecutor, Puducherry High Court of Madras.

Crl.R.C.No.877 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 GMY(18/09/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/