Jagadeesh v. Lakshmanan

C.M.P.No.7455 of 2025 in C.M.A(Sr).No.36725 of 2025 S.SOUNTHAR, J.

Notice to the respondents 1 and 2 is already dispensed with.

2.Though notice was served on the 3rd respondent and its name appear in the cause list, there is no representation for the 3rd respondent.

3. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay is condoned.

24.04.2025 ub Note:Registry is directed to number the CMA and list it for admission, if it is otherwise in order.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis