Nalani Kumar @ Tada Kumar v. Sub Inspector Of Police

Crl.O.P.Nos.6507, 6460, 6434, 6430 & 6367 of 2023 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

The petitioner in all the petitions, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 6(4) of Tamilnadu Scheduled Commodities (RDCS) order 1982 r/w. Section 7(1)(a)(ii) of Essential Commodities Act in Crime Nos.31 of 2023, 44 of 2023, 29 of 2023, 32 of 2023 and 28 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused was found to be illegally traded totally 2200 Kgs of PDS rice, which are worth about Rs.72,600/-. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in these cases based on the confession recorded from other arrested accused. He would submit that all these cases have been

registered on the same day and the petitioner does not have any previous case as against him and thereby, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner has involved in five cases of similar nature and the total contraband involved in these cases are 2200 kgs of PDS Rice, which are worth about Rs.72,600/-. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. In order to curb the illegal activities of transporting PDS rice, the petitioner undertakes to deposit a sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand only) as non-refundable deposit to "The District Revenue Officer, Tiruvallur District" without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court. However, it is made clear that merely, because the petitioner deposits the said amount, it would not amount to

admission of his guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently.

7. Taking into consideration the facts and the submissions of both sides, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

8. Accordingly, the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand only) by way of Demand Draft/RTGS/NEFT as a non-refundable deposit to the credit of "District Revenue Officer, Tiruvallur District" without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trail Court, on such deposit and production of proof, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate-VI, Egmore on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction

of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that :

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand only) as a non-refundable deposit to the credit of District Revenue Officer, Tiruvallur District and the receipt of the same shall be produced before the concerned learned Magistrate at the time of execution of bond.

[c] Merely, because the petitioner deposits the said amount, it would not amount to admission of his guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently. [d] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of one week and thereafter every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[e] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[f] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[g] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

[h] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

27.03.2023 mpa

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

mpa Crl.O.P.No.6507, 6460, 6434, 6430 &6367 of 2023 27.03.2023