Madras High CourtWP/8122/2020disposed of

A.M.Shanmugam v. Thecommissioer Of Land Administration

2020-08-03Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 03.08.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.8122 of 2020 and W.M.P.Nos.9646 & 9648 of 2020 1.A.M.Shanmugam 2.R.Shanmugasundaram ... Petitioners Vs.

1. The Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai 5.

2. The Collector, Namakkal District, Namakkal.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruchengode, Namakkal District.

4. The Tahsildar, Komarapalayam Taluk, Komarapalayam, Namakkal District.

5. The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Namakkal.

6. The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Kalyana Venkataramana Perumal Kovil, Avathipalayam, Kaliyanur Village, Agraharam Post, Komarapalayam Taluk, Namakkal District.

7. The Superintendent of Police, Namakkal District, Namakkal.

8. The Inspector of Police, Pallipalayam Police Station, Namakkal District.

...Respondents

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from evicting the petitioners for starting construction in the name of engineering college and regional transport office in the lands situated in S.Nos.24, 25 and 124 of Kaliyanur Village, Komarapalaym Taluk, Namakkal District, which is subject matter of the proceedings pending before the first respondent without due process of law and pass orders.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Elangovan For Respondents : Mr.S.N.Parthsarathy, Government Advocate

O R D E R

It is brought to the notice of this Court that the first respondent has passed an order through proceedings dated 09.07.2020. In view of the same, no further orders can be passed in this writ petition and if the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the first respondent, it is for the petitioner to workout his remedy in accordance with law. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks for a weeks time for the petitioner to workout his remedy and submits that the family is residing in the property. If the respondents proceed further to evict them they will put to hardship. The process shall be put on hold for a week from today and thereafter, it is left open to the respondent to take action in accordance with law.

3.This writ petition is disposed accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To