The Managing Director v. Dhanalakshmi

CMP No.6549 of 2025 in CMA SR No.35779 of 2025 S.SOUNTHAR, J.

Notice to the 5th respondent already dispensed with.

Though notice was served to the 6th respondent and its her name appear in the cause list, there is no representation on behalf of the 6th respondent.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents 1 to 4.

Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the petition the delay of 248 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

Registry is directed to number the civil miscellaneous appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission.

Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.S.N.Subramani, counsel for the respondents 1 to 4 at the time of admission.

30.04.2025 mst https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis