T.G.Ranganathan v. T.G.Jayagopal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 18.06.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R. MALA A.S.No.228 of 2007 1.T.G.Ranganathan 2.T.G.Sreedhar ..Appellants/Defendants 1 & 2 /vs/ 1.T.G.Jayagopal 2.T.G.Devarajan ..Respondents/Plaintiff/3rd respondent Prayer: First Appeal filed under Section 96 C.P.C. against the Judgment and decree dated 06.04.2004 passed by the learned IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai in O.S.No.6154 of 2002. For Appellants :No appearance For R1 : Mr.T.Viswanatha Rao For R2 : No appearance

J U D G M E N T

When the matter was taken up, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants for the past several hearings. Therefore, the matter was posted today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today, learned counsel for the first respondent is present. But there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. Therefore, this First Appeal is dismissed for default. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub Assistant Registrar To IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. Copy to:

The Section Officer,V.R.Section, High Court, Madras. Gj(co) krd 30/6 A.S.No.228 of 2007 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/