Madras High CourtWP/22397/2017disposed of

K.Manokaran v. The Director Directorate

2017-08-28Honourable Mr Justice N. Kirubakaran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.08.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN W.P.No.22397 of 2017 and W.M.P.No. 23494 of 2017 K.Manokaran

...Petitioner

Vs.

1. The Director, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, Room No.446-A, Nirman Bhawan, Maulana Azad Road, New Delhi - 110 108.

2. The Secretary, Department of General Health & Family Welfare, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

3. Secretary, Selection Committee, Directorate of Medical Education, 162, EVR Periyar Salai, Kilpauk, Chennai - 600 010.

4. Central Board of Secondary Education, National Eligibility cum Entrance Test Unit, Shiksha Kendra, 2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi - 110 092.

5. Central Board of Secondary Education, New No-3, Old No.1630 A, "J" Block, 16th Main Road, Anna Nagar West, Chennai - 600 040.

6. Medical Council of India, Pocket - 14, Sector - 8, Dwarka Phase - 1, New Delhi - 110 077.

...Respondents

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1-4 to consider the candidature of the petitioner's daughter Ms.Monisumithaa Manokaran bearing roll number 909001632, bearing application number 80337939 for the allotment of medical seal in All India quota NEET selection and allot a medical seat to the petitioner's daughter.

For Petitioner : Mr. AR.L.Sundaresan Senior Counsel for N.Jayakumar For Respondents : Mr.Su.Srinivasan Additional Solicitor General [For R1] Mr.P.Senthilvel Government Advocate [For R2 & R3] Mr.G.Nagarajan [For R4 & R5] Mr.V.P.Raman [For R6]

O R D E R

As far as W.P.No.22397 of 2017 is concerned, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner had already secured medical seat under the State quota and he had also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, no further order is required and hence, the present writ petition stands disposed of. However, there is no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS III ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar maya To