← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/9145/2022dismissed

Yellanti Chandramuarali v. The State Of Tamilnadu

2022-04-26Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Sixth day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.9145 of 2022 1 YELLANTI CHANDRAMUARALI [ PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED ] 2 HEMALATHA@MARY 3 YELLATI MANGAMMA 4 JAYANTHI 5 PULI SUBBULAMMA 6 SARASU 7 VICTORIA 8 PREM KUMAR 9 DHANA SEKAR 10 D.VIJAYALAKSHMI 11 RUKMANGUTHAN 12 KAMALAMMA Vs 1 THE STATE OF TAMILNADU [1st RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT] REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, F-2,EGMORE POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

2 THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ULAVAPADU POLICE STATION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

For Petitioner : M/S. R.SUBRAMANIAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners herein, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A r/w 34 of IPC, in Crime No.13 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The petition for Inter-State anticipatory bail alleging arrest by the respondent Police Ulavapadu Police Station, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh is filed. The First Information Report against these petitioners indicates that the 1st petitioner suppressing his earlier marriage had married the de facto complainant and also received dowry. When that was questioned by the de facto complainant, she was forced to leave the matrimonial home. She has also alleged life threat at the hands of the certain named persons who alleged to have intimacy with these petitioners.

3. This Court considering the facts and the request of the InterState bail and on hearing the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) dismisses the petition and it is for the petitioners to approach the concerned Court, which has jurisdiction over the subject matter, so that the respondent police, which is investigating the matter will have an opportunity to put forth the facts, which has been collected so far in the course of the investigation.

4. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 26/04/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, F-2, EGMORE POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ULAVAPADU POLICE STATION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1CC to M/S. R.SUBRAMANIAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.6334 CRL OP.9145/2022 Date :26/04/2022 CSK 29/04/2022