M/S.Indusind Bank Ltd v. A.Dhanasamy

Arb.Appln.No.140 of 2023 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

Learned Advocate Commissioner filed his report dated 26.04.2023, stating that he had executed the warrant with great difficulties and seized the vehicle and handed over the same to the applicant. He would further submit that during the process of executing the warrant, though the Police personnel were present, he faced lot of threats from the respondent. He has also filed a memo seeking for additional remuneration.

2.As regards the additional remuneration sought by the learned Advocate Commissioner, the learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant would comply it, if any order is passed in this regard. Further, she seeks liberty to approach the Arbitrator to get further orders to sell the vehicle.

3.In view of the above, the Advocate Commissioner is discharged and the applicant is directed to pay a sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Only) to the Advocate Commissioner as additional https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

vga remuneration within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The applicant is at liberty to approach the learned Arbitrator to get further orders to sell the vehicle. 4.Hence, no further order is required in the present application. 27.04.2023 vga Arb.Appln.No.140 of 2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis