Kalaiselvi, F/A Years, v. The State Of Tamil Nadu,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.12.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE S.RAMATHILAGAM H.C.P. No.1821 of 2018 Kalaiselvi ... Petitioner/Mother of the Detenue -Vs1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By the Secretary Home, Prohibition & Excise Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The Commissioner of Police, The Greater Chennai City, Vepery, Chennai - 600 007.

... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records relating to the detention order in Memo No.611/BCDFGISSSV/2018, dated 31.07.2018 passed by the 2nd respondent under the Tamilnadu Act 14 of 1982 and set aside the same and direct the respondent to produce the petitioner's son Aravind @ Katta Aravind Son of Kumar aged about 26 years the detenue, now confined in Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai before this Court and set the petitioner's son Aravind @ Katta Aravind Son of Kumar aged about 26 years the detenu herein at liberty.

For Petitioner :

Mr.U.Yuvaraj For Respondents:

Mr.R.Prathap Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor *****

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by C.T.SELVAM, J.] The petitioner, who is the mother of the detenu, namely, Aravind @ Katta Aravind, Son of Kumar, age 26 years, challenges the impugned order of detention, dated 31.07.2018 in No.611/BCDFGISSSV/2018 detaining her son as "GOONDA", as contemplated under Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of dangerous activities of Boot leggers, Drug Offenders, Forest

Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Slum-grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 (Tamil Nadu Act 14/1982).

2. The detenu has come to adverse notice in the following case:- S.No.

Police Station & Crime No.

Section of Law 1.

E2 Royapettah Police Station in Crime No.202/2017 341, 324 & 506(ii) IPC The ground case has been registered against the detenu in Crime No.173/2018 on the file of the Inspector of Police, E2 Royapettah Police Station for offences u/s 147, 148, 294(b), 353, 333, 397, 307, 506(ii) IPC r/w 3(1) of Tamil Nadu Public Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act 1992. The detention order has been passed by Second respondent in Memo No.611/BCDFGISSSV/2018 on 31.07.2018.

3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents. We have also perused the records produced by the Detaining Authority.

4. Though several grounds have been raised in the Habeas Corpus Petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, confines his argument only in respect of nonapplication of mind on the part of the detaining authority in passing the order of detention.

5. The Grounds of Detention would reveal that one adverse cases have been registered against the detenu and a ground case was registered against him in Cr.No.173/2018 for the offences 147, 148, 294(b), 353, 333, 397, 307, 506(ii) IPC r/w 3(1) of Tamil Nadu Public Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act 1992. Admittedly, the detenu has not moved any bail application in the ground case. Therefore, the probability of release of the detenu imminently does not arise. Hence, we are inclined to set aside the detention order. Though the detaining authority has made reliance on similar case, in which an accused was granted bail, the facts involved in those cases are different. The principle of similarity cannot be applied mechanically. Normally, bails are granted based on the facts and circumstances of each case. Therefore, similar case plea, cannot be taken into consideration.

Hence, there is no material to substantiate that there is real possibility of the detenue coming out on bail and the said order was passed without application of mind.

6. In the result, the Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the order of detention in Memo No.611/BCDFGISSSV/2018, dated 31.07.2018, passed by the first respondent is set aside. The detenu, namely, Aravind @ Katta Aravind Son of Kumar, aged about 26 years, is directed to be released forthwith unless his detention is required in connection with any other case. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vv2 To:

1.The Secretary Home, Prohibition & Excise Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The Commissioner of Police, The Greater Chennai City, Vepery, Chennai - 600 007.

3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.

4.The Joint Secretary Public (Law and order) Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

5.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.

H.C.P.No.1821 of 2018 GJ(CO) rrs 10/01/2019