Kumari Aged 55 Yrs v. The State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 24.04.2018 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.O.P.No.9883 of 2018 Kumari

...Petitioner

Vs.

The State Rep. by

1. The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram District.

2. The Inspector of Police, C6, Mailam Police Station.

... Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C to direct the second respondent to register the case based on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner on 11.03.2018. For Petitioner : Mr.C.D.Modhi For Respondents : Mrs.Kritika Kamal.P Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This criminal original petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to register the case based on complaint given by the petitioner on 11.03.2018.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents.

3. In view of the order passed by this Court in Sugesan Transport Pvt. Ltd., -Vs- The Assistant Commissioner of Police, J2, Adyar Police Station, Adyar, Chennai-600 020 and another [2016 (5) CTC 577 : 2016-2-LW (Crl.) 499], this petition is not maintainable.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. Hence, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner set out in Sugesan (supra).

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar dh To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram District.

2. The Inspector of Police, C6, Mailam Police Station.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.C.D.Modhi, Advocate, S.R.No.30269 Crl.O.P.No.9883 of 2018 CS/08/05/18 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/