Rizvana @ Fargana v. State Rep By

Crl.OP.No.15460 of 2022 Crl.O.P.No.15460 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 380 of IPC, in Crime No.9 of 2021, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and other accused had committed theft from the shop of the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and no way connected with the alleged offence and she has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner herein is having six previous cases. He would further submit that there is no change of circumstances after the previous dismissal order passed by this Court. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.OP.No.15460 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

mn

5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the bad antecedent of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 25.07.2022 mn Crl.O.P.No.15460 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis