Madras High CourtCRP/73/2017disposed of

R. Gnanaprakasam v. P.I. Mohammed Kutty@Mammootty

2017-01-12Honourable Mrs Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12.01.2017 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA C.R.P.P.D.No.73 of 2017 R.Gnanaprakasam .. Petitioner -Vs.-

1. P.I.Mohammed Kutty @ Mammootty

2. Smt.Sulfah Mohammed Kutty

3. Dulquer Salmaan Mohammed Kutty

4. Surumy Mammootty

5. P.S.Abbu

6. M.Chandrasekaran

7. Karpagam

8. K.Selvakumar

9. K.Babu 10.K.Sandhya 11.Savuriammal 12.K.P.Pandian 13.K.P.Kalanithi 14.K.P.Vijayakumari 15.Parimala 16.Sarala Subramani (died) (12th defendant) P.Karpagam (deceased)(13th defendant)

17. P.Navaneetha Raj

18. N.Lakshmi 19.N.Jayaraman 20.N.Radha

21. N.Rakmani

22. S.Parimala 23.S.Kumaresan 24.Suguna @ Jayanthi

25. S.Karthick

26. D.Chinnikrishnan

27. D.Swaminathan

28. D.Karunanidhi

29. D.Logeshwari

30. D.Dhanaparvathy

31. D.Vijayalakshmi

32. D.Sakthivel

33. Neelavathi

34. S.Ravi

35. S.Gomathy

36. P.Anjana Priya

37. P.Gomatheeswaran(Minor)

38. R.Radhakrishnan .. Respondents Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying for speedy disposal of the above suit in O.S.No.7 of 2008 pending on the file of the Principal Sub Judge, Chengalpattu. For petitioner ... Mr.Ravichandran Sudaresan

O R D E R

The revision is filed seeking a direction to the Principal Sub Judge, Chengalpattu for speedy disposal of O.S.No.7 of 2008, which is filed for declaration that the cancellation deed dated 06.05.1998 is null and void.

It is seen from the papers that there is no relief sought against the present revision petitioner. However, it is his case that because of the pendency, the petitioner is unable to move the revenue authorities for mutation of his name. The suit is pending from the year 2008 without any progress. It is also not known whether all the defendants have filed their written statement. The revision petitioner claims to be a senior citizen and seeks speedy disposal of the suit. 3.

Whether the revision petitioner is entitled to ask for such relief or not, it is incumbent upon the learned Judge to dispose of the suit, which is of the year 2008 at the earliest. Therefore, this Court is inclined to give a direction to the Principal Sub Judge, Chenglpattu to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.7 of 2008 within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

With the above direction, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

srn 12.01.2017

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA.J srn To The Principal Sub Judge, Chengalpattu C.R.P.P.D.No.73 of 2017 http://www.judis.nic.in