← Library
Madras High CourtArb Appln/137/2023disposed of

M/S. Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Company Limited v. Gajanan Naraya Bondre

2023-04-24Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy6 pages

Arb. Appln.No.137 of 2023 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J., This application has been filed seeking for a direction to appoint an employee of the Applicant to seize and take possession of the vehicle morefully described in the schedule to the Judges summons to the application.

2.

The learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that the applicant provided loan to the respondent for purchase of the commercial vehicle viz., Force Tempo Traveller, bearing Engine No.D63027343 and Chassis No.MC1E4DCA9GP023358 and Registration No.MH-07-C-9620. Thereupon, the respondent has entered into Loan Agreement dated 06.03.2020 with the applicant. The brief details in nutshell are as follows:

S.No.

Particulars Remarks 1.

Name of the lender The applicant 2.

Name of the borrower Mr.Gajanan Narayan Bondre 1/6

S.No.

Particulars Remarks 3.

Name of the Co-borrower Mr.Laxmi Narayan Bondre 4.

Date of Loan Agreement 06.03.2020 5.

Loan Amount Rs.9,02,467/- 6.

No.of instalments 48 monthly installments 7.

First instalment 10.04.2020 8.

Last instalment 10.08.2024 9.

Sofar instalments paid as on 14.03.2023 12 instalments 10.

Notice 27.09.2022 11.

Reply to the notice No 12.

Rate of interest 22.00% p.a.

13.

Amount claimed Rs.8,25,604.82/- 14.

Arbitration proceedings initiated Initiated & pending 03/SG214/2022

3. The learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the respondent, having availed the loan, failed to repay the same and committed default from 13th instalment onwards. He would submit that the hypothecated vehicle is a movable asset and if it is kept in idle condition, it would get damaged and its value also gets deteriorated and hence he urge this Court to appoint a Receiver to seize and handover the vehicle to the applicant company morefully described in the schedule to 2/6

the Judges summons available at the respondents premises, in order to make the security effective and the money in dispute in arbitration is fully secured by way of sale of the vehicle in public auction after following due process of law.

4. Despite service of notice and printing the name of the respondent in the Cause List, none appeared on behalf of the respondent. which shows that the respondent is not interested to prosecute the application.

5. Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, this Court is satisfied that the applicant has made out a case in its favour and accordingly, Mr. Somnath Uttamrao Panchal, MA., LLB, Regional Legal Manager is appointed as a Receiver to seize the vehicle, viz., Force Tempo Traveller, bearing Engine No.D63027343 and Chassis No.MC1E4DCA9GP023358 and Registration No.MH-07-C-9620, 3/6

lying at the respondent's premises or wherever found and hand over the same to the custody of the applicant.

6. It is hereby made clear that if police help is required, the Receiver shall make a request to the local police station within whose jurisdiction the vehicle is found and on such request being made, the Station House Officer shall send the Police Personnel along with the Receiver to seize the vehicle. If breaking open of a lock is required, the Receiver shall do so in the presence of the police personnel who will counter-sign the record evidencing the breaking open of the lock and relocking of the premises. After seizure, the vehicle is to be handed over to the applicant or to their representative, after taking inventories. It is made clear that after seizure of the vehicle, the applicant shall not sell away the vehicle without permission of this Court.

7. Accordingly, this Application is disposed of. 4/6

8. List the matter on 19.06.2023 for filing report of the Receiver. 24.04.2023 mp 5/6

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J., mp Arb Appln.No.137 of 2023 24.04.2023 6/6