Ramesh v. State Rep. By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 10.06.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR Ramesh, S/o.Govindasamy, No.3909, Rottu Street, Vinuvampattu Village, Kalasapakkam Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.

... Petitioner Vs.

State represented by The Inspector of Police, Kalasapakkam Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.

(Crime No.13 of 2020) ... Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in Crime No.13 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner :

Mr.P.Kannan Kumar For Respondent :

Mr.S.Karthikeyan, Additional Public Prosecutor 1/6

O R D E R

The petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 09.01.2020 for the offences punishable under Sections 353, 506 (ii), 307, 379, 430 IPC r/w Section 21(5) of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 and Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Public Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992, in Crime No.13 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 07.01.2020, the defacto complainant, Special Sub-Inspector of Police, when patrolling, the petitioner herein, was driving the lorry with two unit sand without prior permission from the Government and abused the police, came closer to the police personnel and threatened them. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not involved in any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would submit that the petitioner had only carried two unit of sand from private property. Despite the petitioner explaining the same to the respondent, he was arrested. Further, he would submit that the petitioner was in judicial custody from 09.01.2020 and seeks bail for the petitioner. 2/6

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner transported two unit of sand in his lorry without prior permit. Hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 5.

This Court, by order dated 31.03.2020, has passed a detailed order and granted interim bail to the petitioner till 27.04.2020 on he executing his own bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) before the Superintendent of the concerned prison in which the petitioner has been confined and thereafter, posted the case to be listed on the second week of June.

6. Taking into consideration the nature of allegations against the petitioner in the FIR and also taking note of the fact that the petitioner has already been granted interim bail by this Court on 31.03.2020, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions : (a) the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) to the Cancer Institute (WIA), (Regional Cancer Centre), Adyar, Chennai-600 020 (Bank:Andhra Bank, Madhya Kailash, SB A/c.No.149710011005477) and on such deposit the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail;

(b) the petitioner shall execute two sureties for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each, before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date of lifting of lockdown and commencement of 3/6

regular functioning of Court below, failing which the bail granted by this Court shall stand dismissed automatically;

(c) the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the learned Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (d) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

(e) the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature; (f) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; (g) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(h) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

(i) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

7. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered. 10.06.2020 nsd To 1.The Principal District Judge, Thiruvannamalai.

4/6

2.The Judicial Magistrate, Kalasapakkam, Thiruvannamalai District.

3.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Vellore.

4.The Inspector of Police, Kalasapakkam Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.

5.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

5/6

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

nsd 10.06.2020 6/6