← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/6913/2024granted

Kugan v. State Rep.By

2024-04-10Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi4 pages

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 IPC in Crime No.172 of 2023, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused had committed theft of pooja articles and sold the same for a sum of Rs.8,000/-. Hence the complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that A1 was arrested and later, enlarged on bail by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Cuddalore. Therefore, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondent Police would submit that A1 caught red handed. 5.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.

6.Taking into consideration the facts of the case and the submissions made by the learned Counsel on either side, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions;

7.Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the credit of Crime No.172 of 2023 and on such receipt and receipt of proof of payment, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Cuddalore, on condition that petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[a]the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the

Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

(b) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police station daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two months;

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs.State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW5560]; and;

(f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC; 10.04.2024 vkr

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

vkr 10.04.2024