The Divisional Manager v. Mr.Sakthivel

C.M.P.No.6555 of 2025 in C.M.A(Sr).No.37733 of 2025 S.SOUNTHAR, J.

Though notice served on 2nd respondent and his name appears in the list, there is no representation.

2. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the 1st respondent

3. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 245 days in filing the above CMA is condoned.

3. Registry is directed to print the name of M/s.M.Santhanaraman, learned counsel for the 1st respondent at the time of admission.

nr 25.04.2025 Note:Registry is directed to number the CMA and list it for admission, if it is otherwise in order.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis