← Library
Madras High CourtWP/10292/2024disposed of

S.Manikandan v. The Inspector General Of Registration

2024-04-16Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16.04.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR S.Manikandan ...

Petitioner versus 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Office of the Inspector General of Registration No.100, Santhome High Road, Santhome, Chennai - 600 004.

2.The District Registrar, District Registration Office, Collectorate Compound, State Bank Road, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu - 641 018.

3.The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Sub Registrar Office Street, Anaimalai (Tk), Coimbatore (Dt), Tamil Nadu - 642 104.

4.Malayathal 5.Deivathal 6.Dhanalakshmi 7.Sivakumar 8.Sakthivel ...

Respondents 1/5

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to consider petitioner's representation dated 05.02.2024 and cancel the registered documents vide Document No.119 of 2012 dated 09.01.2012, 120 of 2012 dated 09.01.2012 and Document No.6683 of 2023 dated 12.12.2023 on the file of the Sub-Registrar Office, Anaimalai / 3rd respondent.

For Petitioner :

Mr.A.V.Vignesh For Respondent Nos.1 to 3 :

Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

2.

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 05.02.2024 and also to cancel the registered documents vide Document Nos.119 and 120 of 2012 dated 09.01.2012 and Document No.6683 of 2023 dated 12.12.2023 on the file of the third respondent.

2/5

3.

According to the petitioner, title in respect of property has already been decided between the parties in S.A.No.678 of 2014, wherein the Court has clearly held that the Will relied upon by the fifth respondent has not been proved in the manner known to law, and accordingly the Second Appeal was dismissed. Therefore, according to the petitioner, the agreement for sale entered in respect of the said property should be cancelled. Since the decree is in favour of the petitioner, let the petitioner register the Second Appeal decree for registration in accordance with law. 4.

With the above observation, this Writ Petition is disposed. No costs.

16.04.2024 Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No : Yes / No sri 3/5

To 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Office of the Inspector General of Registration No.100, Santhome High Road, Santhome, Chennai - 600 004.

2.The District Registrar, District Registration Office, Collectorate Compound, State Bank Road, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu - 641 018.

3.The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Sub Registrar Office Street, Anaimalai (Tk), Coimbatore (Dt), Tamil Nadu - 642 104.

4/5

N.SATHISH KUMAR , J.

sri 16.04.2024 5/5