← Library
Madras High CourtWP/15584/2016disposed of

K. Thirunavukarasu v. The Secretary To Government

2016-04-27Honourable Mr Justice T.Raja2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.04.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.15584 of 2016 K.Thirunavukarasu ... Petitioner -Vs1. The Secretary to Government Revenue Department Fort St.George Chennai 600 009

2. The Principal Secretary / Commissioner of Revenue Administration Chepauk Chennai 600 005 ... Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 15.07.2015.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ilamvaludhi For Respondents : Mr.R.Vijayakumar Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

The petitioner, Mr.K.Thirunavukarasu has been permitted to retire from service by the proceedings of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruchengode dated 31.1.2009 bearing Na.Ka.No.2159/07 (A). However, his grievance is that his services have not been regularised for the purpose of receiving pension. In this regard, the Tahsildar, Tiruchengode has also sent a proposal to the District Collector, Namakkal in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.21504/2005/A2 dated Nil.03.2013 that from 31.12.75 to 14.11.80 the petitioner had not suffered any punishment at all. Thereafter, the record shows that the Additional Principal Secretary/Commissioner of Revenue Administration has also sent a D.O.letter to the District Collector, Namakkal in Na.Ka.Estt.5 (2)/17645/2013 dated 9.5.2013 to take immediate action in the matter. In spite of the above communications, no action has been https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

taken. The petitioner has also given his representation on 15.7.2015. Finding no response, again he is constrained to come to this Court.

2. Mr.R.Vijayakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondents.

3. Considering the fact that the petitioner was allowed to retire from service by the proceedings of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruchengode dated 31.1.2009 and subsequently the proposal for regularisation of his services was also sent by the Tahsildar, Tiruchengode to the District Collector, Namakkal in Na.Ka.No.21504/2005/A2 dated Nil.03.2013 stating that the petitioner did not suffer any punishment during the relevant period, followed by yet another communication sent by the Principal Secretary/Commissioner of Revenue Administration dated 9.5.2013, the second respondent is hereby directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 15.7.2015 on merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of ten weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. For the said purpose, the petitioner is also directed to make a fresh representation along with a copy of this order. With this direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ss To

1. The Secretary to Government Revenue Department Fort St.George Chennai 600 009

2. The Principal Secretary / Commissioner of Revenue Administration Chepauk Chennai 600 005 +1cc to Mr.S.Ilamvaludhi, Advocate, S.R.No.26179 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.26804 W.P.No.15584 of 2016 PUR(CO) CA(25/05/2016) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/