Madras High CourtWP/33311/2014disposed of

M.Bhagawathy v. The Commissioner

2016-08-24Honourable Mr Justice M. Jaichandren2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.08.2016

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN W.P.No.33311 of 2014 M.Bhagawathy .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner, Coimbatore Corporation, Big Bazaar Street, Coimbatore.

2.A.Senthil Kumar (R-2 impleaded vide order dated 24.8.2016 in M.P.No.1 of 2015) .. Respondents The writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 10.11.2014, within the time frame fixed by the Court.

For Petitioner : Dr.P.Vasudevan For Respondents : Mr.K.Magesh for R-1

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the first respondent.

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, praying that this Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 10.11.2014, within the time frame, as fixed by this Court.

Though various grounds have been raised in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the first respondent is directed to dispose https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

of the representation, dated 10.11.2014, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. In view of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition and in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, this Court finds it appropriate to direct the first respondent to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 10.11.2014, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as well as to the second respondent. The petitioner shall furnish a copy of the representation, dated 10.11.2014, to the first respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. The writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vvk To The Commissioner, Coimbatore Corporation, Big Bazaar Street, Coimbatore.

1 cc to Mr.K.Magesh, Advocate, sr.48138 1 cc to Mr.Ramesh Rai, Advocate, sr.48371 W.P.No.33311 of 2014 rk co kra 16/09/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/