← Library
Madras High CourtWP/9951/2021dismissed for default

K.Rajeswari v. The District Collector

2024-11-15Honourable Mr Justice M. Sundar,Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar7 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 15.11.2024 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR & W.M.P.No.10565 of 2021 in K.Rajeswari Wife of Late Karivaradhan .. Petitioner vs

1. The District Collector Villupuram District

2. Project Director District Rural Development Agency Office of the Collectorate Villupuram District

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Dindivanam Taluk

Villupuram District

4. The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat) Vallam Block, Gingee Taluk Villupuram District

5. The Tahsildar Gingee Taluk Villupuram District

6. Govindaraj Son of Annamalai .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 to initiate necessary steps to remove the encroachments made in the Government Poramboke stream (Neerodai) land situated at Survey Nos.146/5-6 and 147/6-7, situated at Udayanthangal Village, Gingee Taluk,Villupuram District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 22.07.2020 and restore the same as Government Poramboke stream (Neerodai) land by protecting the ecological things. For Petitioner :

No appearance For Respondents :

Mr.M.S.Arasakumar Government Advocate for R1 to R5 R6 - No appearance

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.) Read this in conjunction with and in continuation of earlier proceedings made in the listing on 13.11.2024, which reads as follows: 'W.P.No.9951 of 2021 and W.M.P.No.10565 of 2021 in W.P.No.9951 of 2021 M.SUNDAR, J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J., [Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR. J.,] There is no representation for writ petitioner either in the physical Court or on 'Videoconferencing' {'VC'} platform but Mr.V.Ravi, learned Special Government Pleader is before us in the physical Court. To be noted, this is a hybrid hearing, which is a daily / regular / routine feature in this Court.

2. However, with the intention of giving an opportunity to writ petitioner and learned counsel for writ petitioner, list this matter tomorrow (14.11.2024) under the cause list caption 'FOR

DISMISSAL'.'

2. Captioned matter is listed under the cause list caption 'FOR DISMISSAL' but the position is no different today. To be noted, there was one more listing yesterday (14.11.2024).

3. Mr.M.S.Arasakumar, learned State counsel for R1 to R5 is before us.

4. As the writ petitioner has not come forward to pursue the writ petition in spite of sufficient opportunity being given, captioned WP is dismissed for default. Consequently, captioned WMP thereat is also dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. [M.S.,J] [K.R.S.,J] 15.11.2024 Index: Yes/No gpa

To

1. The District Collector Villupuram District

2. Project Director District Rural Development Agency Office of the Collectorate Villupuram District

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Dindivanam Taluk Villupuram District

4. The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat) Vallam Block, Gingee Taluk Villupuram District

5. The Tahsildar Gingee Taluk Villupuram District

M.SUNDAR,J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J., gpa 15.11.2024