G.Bose @ Subash v. The State Rep.By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of April Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.7307 of 2021 1 G.BOSE @ SUBASH [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 V.SARAVANAN 3 E.KUMARAN 4 K.SUSI 5 G.SATHISH Vs THE STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POLUR POLICE STATION, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.
CR.NO.210 OF 2021 For Petitioner : M/S. S.B.VISWANATHAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.T.SHUNMUGARAJESWARAN, Government Advocate (crl.side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 294(b), 147, 323 and 506(i) of IPC, in Crime No.210 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is the driver of Transport Corporation, on 08.04.2021, the defacto complainant drove the bus in such a way intimidating the 1st petitioner, at that time, there was a wordy quarrel between the petitioners and the defacto complainant, as a result of which, the petitioners said to have attacked the defacto complainant and caused injuries. Hence, the complaint was registered. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the petitioners said to have attacked the defacto complainant and caused injuries. He would further submit that the injured person has been discharged from the hospital. However, he vehemently opposed grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5.Considering the fact that the injured person has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the Judicial Magistrate's Court, Polur, Thiruvannamalai District, on condition that each of the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.
10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (a) the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (b) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m.
(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
(f) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
-sd/- 19/04/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, POLUR, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVANNAMALAI [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POLUR POLICE STATION, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.
+1 CC to M/S. S.B.VISWANATHAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.5024 CRL OP.7307/2021 Date :19/04/2021 cs 29/04/2021