Seeni v. The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Fifth day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.8898 of 2022 SEENI [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE [ RESPONDENT ] GANGAVALLI POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT, SALEM.

(CRIME NO. 87 OF 2022) For Petitioner : M/S. V.S.ILANGO Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner herein, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 4(1) (aaa) of TN Prohibition Act, in Crime No.87 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioner is an absconding accused in a case where the respondent Police have seized 140 litres of I.D. arrack.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submits that the petitioner is having three previous cases of similar nature and his abscondence will lead to indulge similar offence. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. Considering the antecedents of the petitioner and the quantity of the illicit arrack involved in this case, the petition for anticipatory bail is dismissed.

-sd/- 25/04/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE GANGAVALLI POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT, SALEM.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S. V.S.ILANGO Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.8898/2022 Date :25/04/2022 RW 05/05/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/