Madras High CourtWP/9976/2013dismissed for nonprosecution

Ex Gs-177908l, Vehicle / v. The Union Of India,

2019-11-06Honourable Mr Justice Subramonium Prasad3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATE : 06.11.2019 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD W.P.No.9976 of 2013 V.Venkatesan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Union of India rep by. The Secretary, Ministry of Defense, Government of India, South Block, New Delhi.

2.The Director General Border Roads, Seema Sadak Bhawan, Ring Road, Delhi Cantt, New Delhi - 110 010.

3.The Record Officer, Geral Reserve Engineer Force, Dighi Camp Pune - 15.

4.PAO Geral Reserve Engineer Force, ADM Block, Geral Reserve Engineer Force Centre, Dighi Camp Pune - 15.

5.Chief Engineer(P) Puspak C/O 99 APO 6.The Commander, 36 Board Road Traffic Force(Brtf), Geral Reserve Engineer Fore, C/O 99 APO.

7.The Commanding Officer, 1062 Field Work Shop, Geral Reserve Engineer Force, Pin - 931062. C/o 99.APO.

8.The States Government of Tamil Nadu, rep by. the Chief Secretary, St Geroge Fort, Chennai.

9.The Managing Director, Metro Politan Transport Corporation LTD Chennai.

1/3

10.National Commission Scheduled Tribes, 6th Floor Lok Nayak Bhavan, New Delhi-3 ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in respect of this Order No:Rule 26(1) of CCS(Pension) rule 1972 and chapter 46 of Estt & Administration and 36 TF Discharge order No:14/65/2007 dt 22 Oct 2007 issued by 3rd Respondent to quash the same and to direct 3rd and 9th respondents reemployment.

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents: Mr.S.Ravichandran for RR1 to 7 Ms.K.Bhuvaneswari for R8 Ms.S.Rajeni Ramadoss for R9 Mr.G.K.R.Pandiyan, CGSC for R10

O R D E R

When this writ petition was listed on 04.11.2019, the learned counsel for the petitioner was not present during the first call as well as in the second call and the matter was directed to be posted on 06.11.2019 under the caption 'for - dismissal'. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner in the first call as well as in the second call.

2.It appears that the petitioner is not interested to press this case. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS V ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar tsg 2/3

To 1.The Union of India rep by. The Secretary, Ministry of Defense, Government of India, South Block, New Delhi.