← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/7500/2020dismissed

Hari Krishna Moorthy v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-05-11Honourable Mr Justice T.Raja4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11.05.2020 THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN Hari Krishna Moorthy ..... Petitioner/Accused Vs.

State rep.by Inspector of Police, Kelamangalam Police Station, Krishnagiri District, (Crime No.79/2020) ..... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in event of arrest concerned in Crime No.79/2020 pending on the file of the Respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.S.N.Arunkumar For Respondent : Mr.T.Shunmuga Rajewaran, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ******** 1/4

ORDER

Apprehending arrest for the offence punishable under section 4(1) (aaa) read with 4(1-A) of TNP Act, on the file of the respondent police, the petitioner has come forward with the petition seeking for anticipatory bail.

2. Even as admitted by the petitioner, this is the second anticipatory bail application preferred by him and the earlier anticipatory bail petition laid by him in Crl.O.P.No. 7377 of 2020 had been dismissed by this Court on 30.04.2020. While dismissing the earlier anticipatory bail petition, this Court had taken into consideration that large quantity of liquor bottles which had been seized from the petitioner when all the TASMAC shops throughout the State were closed due to Corona epidemic and the serious nature of offence put forth against him and the pendency of the investigation and accordingly, dismissed the anticipatory bail application preferred by the petitioner.

3. Now, the petitioner has come forward with the second anticipatory bail application seeking anticipatory bail.

2/4

4. Inasmuch as the investigation is still pending and as the offence alleged against the petitioner is a serious one and further as the previous case of a similar nature is also pending against the petitioner as put forth by the learned Public Prosecutor and as rightly contended by the learned Public Prosecutor, there is a likelihood of the petitioner committing the same offence again, in all, I am not inclined to grant the relief sought for by the petitioner.

5. In the result, the criminal original petition is dismissed.

11.05.2020 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No sli To:

1. The Inspector of Police, Kelamangalam Police Station, Krishnagiri District, (Crime No.79/2020)

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 3.

3/4

T.RAVINDRAN,J sli CRL.OP.No.7500 of 2020 11.05.2020 4/4